Programm DE

Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2024

Tagungssprache am ersten Tag ist Englisch

09:00 – 09:30

Registrierung der Teilnehmenden und Begrüßung

09:30 – 09:45

Offizielle Begrüßung durch die Direktorinnen des Instituts für Museumsforschung (IfM) und des Museums Europäischer Kulturen (MEK)

Patricia Rahemipour und Elisabeth Tietmeyer

09:45 – 10:30

Key Note Lecture

Moderation: Patricia Rahemipour (IfM)

Intangible Heritage, Museums and the Senses

Jüngste Studien über die Bedeutung der Sinne in Galerien, Bibliotheken, Archiven und Museen zeigen, dass sinnliche Interaktion sinnvolle Lernerfahrungen ermöglicht, die das Erbe zum Leben erwecken und zu seinem besseren Verständnis führen. Was bedeutet dies für das weite Feld des immateriellen Kulturerbes und der Museen?

Schließlich bezieht das immaterielle Kulturerbe den gesamten menschlichen Körper mit ein. Die Sinnlichkeit, mit der immaterielles Kulturerbe praktiziert und erlebt wird, ist untrennbar mit ihm verbunden, und immaterielles Kulturerbe kann ohne Sinnlichkeit nicht existieren. Die Inventarisierung, Dokumentation und Präsentation von immateriellem Kulturerbe gipfelt jedoch häufig in Darstellungen, die auf der Grundlage einer stark visuell und auditiv geprägten Wissenskonstruktion formuliert werden und oft eine Verdrängung aller Sinne außer dem Sehen und Hören aufweisen.

Sophie Elpers wird in ihrer Keynote der Frage nachgehen, wie das Regime der traditionell als stärker verstandenen Sinne im Bereich des immateriellen Kulturerbes überwunden werden kann und welche Rolle Museen dabei spielen können. Welche Methoden sind ratsam, was sind die Risiken und Herausforderungen, und welche Chancen ergeben sich?

10:30 – 12:30

Podium: Praktiken des immateriellen Kulturerbes

Moderation: Judith Schühle (MEK)

This panel aims to focus on practices that emerge from and surround the intangible in the dynamic field of relations between museums and communities of practice. These practices include (different) notions of securing the intangible, but also negotiations about collecting, preserving, presenting and remembering the intangible in museums. The practices also consist of multiple forms of participation, as well as the (implicit and explicit) questioning of dominant structures (of knowledge) when intangible heritage and the knowledge associated with it enter and thus might challenge the museum’s knowledge system.

Safeguarding intangible heritage in museums:  At the interface of memory and history

The paper draws on Pierre Nora’s discussion of sites of memory, or lieux de mémoire, and positions the distinction ‘between memory and history’ (1989) in contemporary approaches to safeguarding intangible heritage (UNESCO 2003). While ‘memory’ reflects modes of knowledge and practice embedded in sensory and embodied experiences of communities transmitted through the generations, ‘history’ becomes a byword for the emergence of modern knowledge categories of preservation, interpretation and representation, often through the rupture between past and present, and the conflation of the former with diverse socio-political ideologies. How can museum and heritage professionals as actors of history and preservation engage and respond to calls for living heritage passed on by communities? What are the practical and ethical implications of safeguarding living heritage in museums and heritage institutions? The paper aims to address these questions by exploring the conceptual framework surrounding discussions on safeguarding living heritage within the UNESCO 2003 Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage, and considers ways for working with ‘memory’ from a museological perspective. This presupposes a reorientation of museum work from objects curated by trained specialists to community-based knowledges and practices. The paper discusses cases of museums and other heritage institutions operating within the participatory turn and highlights some of the challenges and opportunities of working at the interface of memory and history.

References

Nora, P. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations 26: 7-24 https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520

UNESCO 2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage.

Intangible heritage: museum as space of negotiation

The definition of a museum has been evolving. In early times, museums served as channels to present the concept of a ’nation,‘ enabling people to learn about their country and showcasing its grand achievements. They also introduced exotic forms and ‚colonial subjects‘ through what I call an ‚authorised narrative’, scripted by those who were in the position to exercise influence. However, in contemporary times, museums are not only about exhibiting objects and cultural artifacts; they have become vital knowledge hubs for addressing the importance of incorporating diverse voices to embrace inclusivity and diversity.

In this presentation, I will discuss the various forms of negotiation and the actors involved in different settings, examining their roles in shaping and transmitting intangible heritage. The settings that will be explored include ’sense‘, ‚memory‘, ‚contested spaces‘, and ‚marginalised‘.

The cases will be examined through the idea of the museum as a space of negotiation and performativity: a place that induces debate rather than conformity. Furthermore, the museum is viewed as a space that does not dictate what or how people should think but rather guides them on what to think, nurturing critical thinking and fostering a sense of goodness in good human being.

Participating in the making of heritage. The UNESCO ICH Convention as a tool for decolonization of native/indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities, and local communities in Europe. Reflections from the experience of the Atlas of Intangible Heritage in the Ecomuseum Casentino context (Tuscany-Italy)

Relating the experience of a capacity building workshop devoted to ICH for sustainable development in Florence (Heritage-s. pedagogical approach to the safeguarding of cultural heritage, 2015-16), involving several museums and ecomuseum’s professionals, we analyze some impacts produced by the paradigm of ICH in the minds and practices of the professionals of the heritage sector. 

In a region (Tuscany) with a strong monumental, material and museum-based heritage’s imaginary, the Ecomuseum Casentino – a project involving a network of thematic and little museums, funded by a “Unione dei Comuni” bringing together 17 municipalities in a mountain valley in Tuscany – started in 2018 a process of inventorying ICH. This process launched a mapping and involving Communities, Groups and individuals (CGIs) exercise – making possible to some communities of practices to progressively organize themselves as heritage-communities, with the mediation of the Ecomuseum’s and ICH professionals.

We analyse some key results of this process, at the level of local and community-based narrative and initiatives (the web platform Educational Heritage with the ICH Atlas and the Heritage Communitie’s Pacts), as well as the level of local policies, involving a broad network of stakeholders:  policy-makers, educational institutions, local associations, producers and local companies/business through a common tool: the Patto Territoriale (territorial pact).

What does it mean to uphold Indigenous rights in practice and decolonizing museums and heritage?

This talk addresses this question by drawing upon extensive research in Western Canada on decolonizing heritage in relation to the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation’s Calls to Action and the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The findings are informed by two UK Arts and Humanities Research Council funded projects, Renewing Relations: Indigenous Heritage Rights and (Re)conciliation in Northwest Coast Canada 2022-24and Namała: The Future of Indigenous Rights and Responsibilities 2023-25, and the ideas inform my new UKRI FLF project 2025-29.

In this talk four practice-based approaches will be considered to illustrate how museums can make a positive contribution to decolonizing tangible and intangible heritage, and professional heritage practice.

The first step is to address the power dynamics related to the concept of heritage itself. The colonial history of heritage-making must be acknowledged so that the power of heritage can be recognized, decolonized, and used to support Indigenous rights.

The second step is to consider the processes and practices that can be adopted to create conceptual space for non-western ontologies, epistemologies and axiologies to be spoken, heard, and honoured within and beyond the museum. Practices of care-taking and response-ability can help create safer shared spaces.

The third step invites a greater awareness of the relationships between tangible and intangible heritage, bringing a more accountable and connected approach to decolonization.

Finally, the talk invites listeners to think beyond today to consider how to address harms that are still unfolding and those yet to come, and to build meaningful, reciprocal decolonial relationships that can enable local reclaiming, repairing, rebuilding, renewing, resilience, and revitalization.

12:30 – 14:00

Mittagessen im Forschungscampus Dahlem (Selbstzahler)

14:00 – 16:00

Podium: Orte des Immateriellen

Moderation: Helmut Groschwitz, München, Deutschland

This panel is dedicated to the places and spaces that constitute the sites of intangible heritage and their influence on the dynamic and transformative relationships between communities of practice, museums, and the intangible itself. We would like to explore the meaning of place for intangible heritage and the role it might play in relation to the living heritage that is preserved, transmitted and presented in museums. We would also like to explore ecomuseums as places and digital museums as spaces for intangible heritage and their interrelationships with living heritage and communities of practice.

Intangible Cultural Heritage in Context: the dynamics of living heritage, place, and its safeguarding

With the understanding that ICH is embodied and vitalized by people, its keepers and communities, they therefore play the most crucial roles in shaping and changing the relationships that their living cultural traditions, practices, and expressions have to place – in conceptual and concrete, historical and contemporary, local and transnational, organic and more deliberate (and activist) ways. Through this lens, I explore the shifting dynamics of these relationships, as contextualized with the broader economic, political, sociocultural, and ecological forces – and threats to people’s wellbeing, livelihoods, and their ICH – that are at play. Indeed, with the mounting and interrelated challenges of today, culture keepers may decide to team up with heritage professionals to: bolster the sustainability of their ICH; keep strong its ties to place, however fluid; and raise wider awareness of issues faced. In this light, I also consider ICH through the lens of safeguarding interventions, examining the relationships of ICH to places and spaces in the heritage enterprise, and drawing on approaches of longstanding ecomuseological and U.S. public folklore frameworks. As based on examples from the U.S., I focus attention onto ICH in the archival context, as a place for its collaborative preservation, reclamation, dissemination, and transmission. I conclude with considerations for museological efforts that provide a space for uplifting people’s ICH, one that can be used to explicitly address present problems – deep-seated and lingering, and in need of rooting out.

LU.GAR (PLA.CES): Mapping Oral Tradition in Cultural Territories

Places are imbued with meaning and significance through the stories, songs, legends, and other oral expressions shared by their inhabitants. These narratives create a layer of imagination that overlays the geographic and physical world, shaping our understanding of our surroundings and connecting us to our communities. In this talk we present the LU.GAR project that sought to map oral traditions within cultural territories. By listening to and studying old storytellers, the project aimed to transmit traditional stories to new generations and motivate new storytellers to embrace the oral traditions of a Place, creating new experiences through them. The project also has a digital version, which adds virtual places from these cultural territories (an essential dimension in the ICH transmission of practices and celebrations today).

The LU.GAR project recognizes that traditional oral expressions are facing challenges in the modern world. In the past, oral tradition was a vibrant part of everyday life. People would gather in the evenings to share stories, passing them down from generation to generation. This was a way of preserving cultural knowledge, values, and beliefs, and also as a form of entertainment and social bonding. In the modern world, traditional ways of sharing oral tradition have declined. People no longer gather around the fire to tell stories. However, these stories are not dying out, but rather transforming and adapting to new times. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to revive oral tradition. This movement is being led by a new generation of storytellers who are committed to keeping this tradition alive. These storytellers are performing in schools, libraries, and other public venues. The LU.GAR project celebrated the transmission of traditional storytellers to contemporary storytellers and the role of these new agents in keeping the traditions alive and ensuring that they continue to be passed down to future generations.

The LU.GAR project, a collaboration between Memória Imaterial (a Portuguese NGO accredited to provide advisory services to the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage) traditional storytellers, communities (Alenquer, Melgaço, Monção, Paredes de Coura, Valença, and Vila Nova de Cerveira), artists and the theater company Comédias do Minho, began with a brief mapping of oral traditions in the municipalities and, as a result it created a space for dialogue, creativity, and the sharing of stories. It is a reminder of the power of storytelling to connect us to our past, present, and future.

THE EMPLACEMENT OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE -AN ECOMUSEUM CASE

The definition of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) promoted by the UNESCO 2003 Convention clearly states that it refers to knowledge and skills but also objects and cultural spaces associated therewith, recognized as such by communities, groups and individuals and transmitted for generations.

This presentation explores the concept of emplacement of cultural practices on two different levels. The first one relates to the enactment of the practice, the element of ICH itself. It is analysed in relation to its embodiment. If bodies are instruments for the expression of experience, places are instruments for its sharing. In this sense places make an integral part of the element and are a crucial aspect for ensuring its transmission which relies on social interaction. The second level explored relates to heritage projects and programmes intended as measures for safeguarding ICH. Emplacement in this context is understood as safeguarding measure which ensures the viability of ICH.

Both levels are explored through one case study, that of the Ecomuseum House of batana, UNESCO good safeguarding practice since 2016. Ecomuseum House of batana is a community-based practice and organisation oriented towards safeguarding the maritime heritage (tangible and intangible) of the City of Rovinj-Rovigno, Croatia.

Ecomuseums as heritage management models are based on two basic concepts, community participation and territoriality. Understanding the importance of holistic and people-centred approach to intangible cultural heritage which is enacted by people in a specific environmental context and providing frameworks which rely on these principles, strengthens the impact of safeguarding measures insuring its viability and enjoyment for future generations.

Co-creation with young adults in a (super)diverse neighbourhood. Making living heritage visible in a museum.

The Dutch Centre for Intangible Cultural Heritage (KIEN) implements the 2003 UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH). One of the main tasks for KIEN is to raise awareness for ICH and to make ICH visible. In this, museums can play a significant role. KIEN itself is part of the Dutch Open Air Museum in Arnhem since 2016. This helps KIEN to give heritage communities an extra stage to show their ICH. Later this year, one of the historic buildings in the museum park will be transformed into a House for ICH. The team of KIEN is currently developing concepts for the exhibition space and how to incorporate this place in the bigger storyline of the museum, which focuses on showing the daily live in a historical perspective. Because ICH is alive, dynamic and often closely connected to a specific environment the exhibition has to do justice to these characteristics. Over the years KIEN gained experience in this by taking part or facilitation several co-creations with museums and heritage communities. For example, an exhibition about the circus culture in the Dutch Open Air Museum; the so-called Crafts Labs in several museums; and, in the Natural History Museum in Rotterdam, an exhibition about the relationship between animals, humans, and ICH. In this presentation I will highlight another project, a co-creation between the Dutch Open Air Museum, KIEN and seventeen children and young adults living in the (super)diverse neighbourhood Presikhaaf in Arnhem. All these youngsters are members of Presikhaaf University, an organization working for equal opportunities for children and young people living in Presikhaaf. From scratch, the partners of this co-creation developed an exhibition and activity program about the (intangible) heritage of neighbourhood that is important for the youngsters. In this panel presentation I will discuss the focus points for museums when they engage in such co-creations and explore the interrelationships between the neighbourhood, its inhabitants, and their living heritage that is showed in the museum. The lessons learned of this co-creation, and the three other projects, are described in the publication Experiences with co-creation. A museological platform for intangible cultural heritage. Tips and recommendations.

16:00 – 16:30

Kaffeepause

16.30 – 17:30

Abschlussrunde mit allen Podiumsteilnehmern

Moderation: Nushin Atmaca (MEK) & Kathrin Grotz (IfM)

16.30 – 17:30

Führungen und Gespräche in den Ausstellungen des MEK

19:30

Empfang (Selbstzahler)

Freitag, 7. Juni 2024

Tagungssprache am zweiten Tag ist Deutsch

09:00 – 09:30

Registrierung der Teilnehmenden und Begrüßung

Rahmenmoderation des Tages: Nushin Atmaca (MEK) & Kathrin Grotz (IfM)

09:30 – 10:00

Key Note Lecture

Moderation: Elisabeth Tietmeyer (MEK)

Immaterielles Erbe – Herausforderungen für die Museumspraxis

Immaterielles Erbe ist ein genuin kulturpolitisches Konzept, das seit einigen Jahrzehnten expansiv in unterschiedliche Felder diffundiert und dort mitunter handlungsleitend wird. Darauf deutet auch der Call for Papers zu dieser Tagung hin: Für Museen würde „materielles und immaterielles Erbe die Grundlage ihrer Arbeit“ bilden, heißt es dort. Mit dem Konzept des immateriellen Erbes sind Versprechen und Erwartungen verbunden. Ausschnitte von Kultur sollen erhalten oder mit gezielten Maßnahmen weitergegeben werden. Die dabei gemanagte und inwertgesetzte Kultur wird zu einer Ressource, sie wird als Ausdruck gelebter kultureller Vielfalt verstanden, als Instrument kultureller Bildung oder etwa als Beispiel nachhaltiger Umgangsweisen mit der Natur.

Vor diesem Hintergrund versucht der Vortrag, immaterielles Erbe als „slogan-concept“ (D. Noyes) kritisch einzuordnen. Er fragt nach den mobilisierenden Aspekten des Konzepts, nach (nicht-intendierten) Effekten der Übernahme und ordnet immaterielles Erbe in globale Prozesse sich verändernder Kulturverständnisse ein, von denen die museale Praxis alles andere als unberührt bleibt. Leisten etwa die Museen mit der Übernahme des Konzepts Kulturerbe der Politisierung, Instrumentalisierung oder Kommodifizierung von Kultur Vorschub? Welche Effekte ergeben sich, wenn kulturpolitische Terminologien (u.a. living heritage, Trägergruppen) Eingang in museale Repräsentationspraktiken finden? Erzeugt die zwangsläufige didaktische Reduktion in der Ausstellungspraxis allenfalls monolithische Perspektiven auf das, was kulturpolitisch als immaterielles Erbe verstanden wird? Und im Gegenzug: Wie können Polyphonie, Dissonanz oder konfligierende Vorstellungen kulturellen Erbes abgebildet werden? Inwiefern erzeugen Museen kulturelles Erbe mit und welche Herausforderungen entstehen dadurch?

10:15 – 11:15

Projekt- und Initiativschaufenster I

Andrea Grimm, Stiftung Deutsches Technikmuseum Berlin, Ort: Foyer FC Dahlem

Gabriele Dafft (LVR-Institut für Landeskunde und Regionalgeschichte), Ort: Veranstaltungsraum (MEK)

11:15 – 11:30

Wegepause

11:30 – 12:30

Projekt- und Initiativschaufenster I (Fortsetzung)

12:30 – 13:30

Mittagessen am Forschungscampus Dahlem (Selbstzahler)

13:30 – 14:30

Projekt- und Initiativschaufenster II

Sarah Zannini (Freie Universität Bozen) & Klaus-Chr. Zehbe (Universität Leipzig)

14:30 – 14:45

Wegepause

14:45 – 15:45

Projekt- und Initiativschaufenster II (Fortsetzung)

15:45 – 16:00

Wegepause

16:00 – 16:30

“Plenary Meeting” mit allen Initiativschaufenstern

Moderation: Patricia Rahemipour (IfM)

Dr. Lisa Maubach, studierte Volkskunde/Europäische Ethnologie an der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Ihre Promotion erfolgte im Fach Volkskunde/Kulturgeschichte an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena zu einem Aspekt des Freizeitverhaltens in der DDR. Sie war lange Jahre freiberuflich im Museumswesen in den Bereichen Ausstellung, Inventarisierung und Vermittlung tätig. Von 2011 bis 2021 war sie wissenschaftliche Referentin im LWL-Freilichtmuseum Hagen. Dort baute sie das Kompetenzzentrum Handwerk und Technik als Plattform für Forschungen zum immateriellen Kulturerbe des Handwerks und seiner Technik in Westfalen-Lippe auf. Sie entwickelte audiovisuelle Methoden, um das Immaterielle in der materiellen Kultur zu erforschen, zu dokumentieren und zu vermitteln. Seit November 2021 ist sie Leiterin der Abteilung Alltagskultur und Sprache im LVR-Institut für Landeskunde und Regionalgeschichte. Auch dort sind Handwerk und Technik sowie Arbeitswelten Forschungsgebiete, u. a. im ethnografischen Film. Sie bleibt damit ihrem Forschungsinteresse an der Verbindung von immaterieller und materieller Kultur mit dem Fokus auf den Menschen treu. Lisa Maubach ist Mitglied in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Empirische Kulturwissenschaft, in der Kommission für Alltagskulturforschung in Westfalen, im Interdisziplinären Arbeitskreises Handwerksquellen im Zentralverband des Deutschen Handwerks und darüber hinaus im Verein WAM! Women in arts and media.